[OT] Reading the OT

I've been reading around hermeneutics recently trying to get a feel of
where it is all going. I don't know anything about anyone in this
group nor if this is a topic already covered, but I was wondering how
we all read the bible? A survey was recently done in New Zealand
around reading the bible. 11% of Christians in NZ read the bible
daily and 13% read it weekly (http://biblesociety.org.nz/global-news/
bible-unread-bestseller/). This is pretty dismal. Is it our faith,
our worldview or the way we read the bible or something else that has
produced these results? How should we read the bible? I believe that
the bible offers the reader a possibility. A different way of doing
life. When I read Isaiah 40 - 55 (the Servant Songs) I see a way of
living that Christ fulfills and the church is to live like this until
Jesus' return. This is a textual reading where I develop 'who' the
character is in relation to 'what' and 'why'. Take Hezekiah for
example, his first 8 days in office he re-opens and re-furnishes the
temple of Yahweh. This shows 'who' he is as a person, same as the
Servant as mentioned previously in Isaiah. But this presents other
problems, do we read the OT in an attempt to discover what the author
is trying to portray? what about the authors context? or do we read it
as how the audience would perceive what has been recorded? Should we
read it as literary text and move from the author? Or does meaning
only come from the reader? Apply all these questions when trying to
interpret the Servant Songs in Isaiah and a never ending problem is
produced.
Where I am at is that the text is only given meaning when the
reader actually reads the text. There is a relationship between the
text and reader, the text is given meaning and is changed during
reading. In the same way the text changes the world of the reader.
And the reader cannot interpret the text without formulating some way
of interpreting what the author is trying to say in the text, or the
world in which the textual content is set. Instead of approaching the
text objectively, we need to own our presuppositions and be honest
with ourselves and the text. Perhaps instead of scrutinizing over the
text, the author and it's origins, perhaps we should read the text and
it's content. As the content develops a story is played out, like a
picture being painted. Upon observing this picture both reader and
text is changed. But let's not throw out the baby with the bath water
because this has the potential to become a highly liberal reading,
e.g. God is not love, but hate. So we are required to intelligently
inquire into the text, it's context, background, author as to grasp a
more grounded understanding of the text. This is to prevent a liberal
reading of it, but not make bible reading so specialized that people
give up before they start.

Just some thoughts. Feel free to give feedback, even critical
feedback is good.

Jimmy.